Trade Compliance

A classifier that argues with you, and shows its working

Most classification tools confirm the heading you gave them, which is worst exactly when you are wrong. The Classification Agent runs its own GRI analysis first, tells you when it disagrees, and cites the rule and source text that took it elsewhere.

What gets in the way

The four that come up every time

Problem 01

Classification lives in one person

The knowledge sits with whoever has been doing it longest. When they are on leave, or they leave, the rationale behind thousands of headings goes with them.

How Infis handles it

Every classification files its reasoning, the GRI rules applied, the source text quoted, and a confidence score against the part. The record survives staff turnover because the reasoning was written down at the time rather than carried in one head.

See it on the platform
Problem 02

Assistants that agree with you are worse than nothing

Ask a general purpose model to check a heading and it will find a way to justify it. That is not review, it is confirmation, and it fails in exactly the cases that matter.

How Infis handles it

The agent classifies independently before it sees your proposal, then reports agreement or disagreement. When it disagrees it shows the rule that took it somewhere else.

See it on the platform
Problem 03

Section 232 scope keeps moving

Pharmaceutical proclamation scope, rates, and exclusions change, and the impact is spread across hundreds of materials that nobody has time to recheck by hand.

How Infis handles it

The Section 232 pharma module flags in scope parts, models duty at the applied rate rather than MFN, and recalculates landed cost across every affected material when scope or rates move.

See it on the platform
Problem 04

Defending a position after the fact

When a broker or an auditor pushes back, a heading with no written rationale is expensive. Reconstructing the argument months later is worse.

How Infis handles it

The reasoning was recorded at the time, with the rule and the quoted source text. You are handing over an argument, not rebuilding one.

See it on the platform
0.91
confidence, with the rule cited

A metering pump assembly proposed as 8413.70.20 was classified independently to 8479.89.94 under GRI 3(b), with the essential character finding and the quoted rule text filed against the part. Anything the agent scores below your threshold goes to a human queue instead.

Start with the supply base you already have

Send a supplier list or an open RFQ. We will run it through Infis and show you the scored result, including the exposure your current process is not surfacing.